Recently local authorities have promised to “crack-down” on illegal hotels. If you are a homeowner in Thailand you may think this is not a concern of yours. However, if you are renting your house or condo out – or if you are using a company to own it and are staying it yourself – this does indeed concern you. Local authorities are empowered under two laws to regulate and tax you in such cases: 1) the Hotel Act; and 2) the House and Land Tax Act.
The Hotel Act (2008) requires any place that provides accommodation for less than a period of one month in exchange for payment is defined as a “Hotel”, regulated by the Hotel Act, and requires a hotel license.
There is a limited exception to this if:
1) the said place has less than five rooms; and
2) cannot accommodate over twenty guests at a time; and
3) the income being earned for such is merely “additional income”,
a license is not required. However, even in that case the owner must report to such accommodation activity to the relevant local authorities.
Anyone who operates Hotel without a license is liable for:
a) a fine of up to THB 20,000; plus
b) a fine of up to THB 10,000 per day of such illicit operation; and
c) imprisonment for up to one year (in the case of a company the person subject to such imprisonment would be director).
House and Land Tax Act
If you or your company own a condominium unit or villa here in Thailand that was used, even if only for one day, by someone other than its legal owner (with or without you having received rental income), then you or your company have incurred liability under the House and Land Tax Act (1932) (“HLT“). The HLT tax is imposed on the owner of such structures, if they receive or should have received, rental income. And the HTL tax is one of the few taxes that localities, rather than the national revenue authorities, are empowered to collect. An important exemption from the HLT tax applies to “houses or other structures inhabited by the owners thereof (…). The amount of HLT tax is 12.5% of an amount equal to the annual “rental value.” It is calculated based on the total annual rental value of the foregoing year. The annual “rental value” is defined as the “sum for which the property might reasonably be expected to let from year to year. When there is a lease, the rent is the basis of the annual value (…)”.
Thus, for example, if you allow an acquaintance stay a few days in your villa or condominium without you, the authorities have the discretion to determine that you did, or should have, charged rent. They may then charge you an amount equivalent to 12.5% of total amount of money that they think you did, or could have, earned by renting it during the entire preceding year. Thus again, if your property is subject to assessable rental income for even one day, then the HLT tax is payable in an amount of 12.5% of the total rental value for the entire year.
Any owner of property subject to HLT tax is required to submit their official declaration of the annual rental value of the property for the foregoing year within 30 days after having received notice from the relevant authorities (or within the time frame outlined in the same notification). The relevant local authorities may then use this information to determine the annual rental value of the property and the amount of tax to be paid.
However, if the local authorities do not agree with the rental value figures submitted, or if no figures are submitted, they are empowered to assess and assign the rental value themselves. Such assessment may be appealed if the owner submitted their official declaration. But not doing means the right to appeal the assessment is waived. Failure to file the official declaration or providing false information, or doing so in order to evade the proper calculation of the annual value, is punishable by fines, imprisonment, or both.
Liability when Using a Company
There are exemptions from the tax under the HLT. The most common is found under Section 10 and is applicable if the houses or condo is inhabited by either:
a) an agent (of the company) to protect the place; or
b) the owners thereof.
One might suppose that one or both of these exemptions must apply where the director of the company is the one staying in the house or condo. After all, isn’t it the director of a company legally obliged to protect the company’s property?
Unfortunately, however, in 2006 the Supreme Court did not concur with this reasoning (ruling no. 1410/2549). Instead, the Supreme Court held that an “agent to protect the place” requires that the agent be actually assigned to protect the building and not just allowed to live there. Thus, according to the Supreme Court a company owning a structure and having its legal representative residing in the building for dwelling purposes is not eligible to that part of the Section 10 exemption.
Alternatively, one might suppose that the other Section 10 exemption should apply to a company’s director. After all, isn’t the director basically the company itself with regard to interacting with third parties—in other words, isn’t the director staying in the building owned by the company the same thing as the owner of the building staying there itself? Unfortunately however in 2007 the Supreme Court said “no” (ruling no. 689/2550). The Supreme Court reasoned that a company can use a structure it owns as a registered address or in the course of its business and therefore it does not need its director to stay there. Moreover, said the Court, since the director is a distinct legal entity from the company, the director living in the building is not the same as the company living in the building. Therefore, the “owner” exemption provided under Section 10 of the HLT also does not apply to such a case.
Thus, if any company—whether Thai or off-shore—owns a house or condo in Thailand and someone, including the director, stays there even for one day, that company will be liable to pay HLT tax.
In closing, it should also be noted that the HLT tax is not the only tax applicable to such use of a building owned by a company. Rental income tax is also payable and assessable by the Revenue Department under the Revenue Code.
DUENSING KIPPEN is an international law firm specializing in business transaction and dispute resolution matters, with offices in Bangkok and Phuket, Thailand and affiliated offices in 45 other countries. Visit them at: duensingkippen.com
There is a limited exception to this if:
3) the income being earned for such is merely “additional income”
What’s the additional income in numbers? Do you know what’s the income limit per year for a normal owner of a condominium?
Many condos in Bangkok are claiming the Hotel Act 2004 saying that short time rentals are illegal in Thailand.
But reading your article seems that is not like that, at the contrary, if an owner pays the HLT it should be perfectly legal.
Hope to get an answer from you.
You should engage competent legal counsel to assist you with such specific inquiries and matters.
I know that many condos in the complex where I live (as a permanent lessee) are rented on a daily or weekly basis even though many signs exist that this practice is illegal. The many permanent residents have tried to curb this activity and the Juristic Person does not seem to be too concerned
I have a small hostel and bar business on the island of Phangan .. I have 14 beds upstairs .. And have just recently recieved paperwork to close. I have had to cancel my bookings . Am I allowed to be open by law . The whole island has nearly been shut down . But after reading this article . I am a little lost ..
Please advise ..